Flow assurance

Low-Adhesion Coatings Provide Novel Gas-Hydrate-Mitigation Strategy

In this study, two coatings were produced and evaluated to determine their effect on hydrate adhesion onto carbon-steel surfaces.

jpt-2017-11-27874f2.jpg
Fig. 2—Images taken through the window in the rocking cell during experiments using an uncoated surface (left) and a surface with the omniphobic coating (right). Hydrates deposited on the uncoated surface but did not deposit on the omniphobic surface. CS=carbon steel.

When certain thermodynamic conditions exist in oil- and gas-production flowlines, gas-hydrate plugs can form and greatly restrict flow. One potential strategy for hydrate management involves allowing hydrates to form but mitigating their ability to deposit on the flowline walls by deploying a low-adhesion, protective surface coating on the inside wall of the flowline. In this study, two coatings were produced and evaluated to determine their effect on hydrate adhesion onto carbon-steel surfaces.

Introduction

In order to test the adhesion of hydrates to the two low-surface-energy coatings, micromechanical-force (MMF) apparatuses were used at low and high pressures. MMF apparatuses have been used historically to investigate both hydrate/hydrate interparticle forces and hydrate/surface interactions.

×
SPE_logo_CMYK_trans_sm.png
Continue Reading with SPE Membership
SPE Members: Please sign in at the top of the page for access to this member-exclusive content. If you are not a member and you find JPT content valuable, we encourage you to become a part of the SPE member community to gain full access.