Academic scientists and advocacy groups are urging the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to withdraw and rewrite proposed guidelines for determining which scientific findings to use when evaluating the safety of toxic chemicals. Critics say that, if adopted, the guidance will allow regulators to exclude high-quality health and risk studies for “ridiculous” reasons, favor industry-backed research, and prevent EPA from considering academic studies that rest on innovative methods.
The EPA’s guidance “is less about evaluating the quality of evidence, and more about eliminating it altogether,” the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) of Washington, DC, wrote this week to EPA in comments blasting the “flawed” proposal, which it says “describes a head-in-sand approach to any evidence that a toxic chemical is toxic.” The EPA, however, says the guidelines are likely to evolve and that it is aiming for an “efficient systematic review process that generates high-quality, fit-for-purpose risk evaluations that rely on the best available science.”
The controversy, which mirrors a debate over a proposal the EPA released earlier this year that critics say would allow the agency to ignore certain human health studies, has its roots in a 2016 overhaul of the nation’s premier chemical safety law, the Toxic Substances Control Act. The revised law aims to make it easier for the EPA to complete safety reviews of new chemicals before they reach the market and to restrict the use of existing chemicals more quickly if new evidence of risks emerges. It also orders the EPA to develop new guidelines for the “systematic review” of the quality of the scientific evidence used in risk assessments.
Read the full story here.
ADVERTISEMENT
Don't miss our latest HSE content, delivered to your inbox twice monthly. Sign up for the HSE Now newsletter. If you are not logged in, you will receive a confirmation email that you will need to click on to confirm you want to receive the newsletter.
First name:
Last name:
Email:
17 Mar 2020 - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
In this course, discover the field applications of machine learning with a focus on reservoir characterization, production analysis and prediction, and recovery enhancement.
29 - 30 Apr 2020 - Brisbane, Australia
We are in the throes of an energy transition - our energy system is evolving rapidly and diversifying, decarbonising and decentralising.
9 - 11 Mar 2020 - Muscat, Oman
Shaping the Future of the Energy Industry.
22 Apr 2020 - Bergen, Norway
The SPE Norway Subsurface Conference brings together the E&P industry to expand industry technical knowledge, connect with innovators and leaders and address technical challenges facing upstream oil and gas professionals.
19 - 20 Feb 2020 - Lafayette, Louisiana, USA
Covering issues related to the identification, prevention, and remediation of formation damage
29 Jan 2020 22:30 GMT - Live, then On Demand
