New Diagnostics Aid Completion Designs

Image courtesy of Statoil Technology Invest
An illustration shows injected fluid distribution along the well. Improved distribution (seen in the left wellbore) can be achieved by applying poroelastic diagnostics to surface pressure data.

A new diagnostic technology that exclusively uses surface pressure data to map hydraulic fracturing in unconventional reservoirs has helped an operator to improve well completion designs in its Oklahoma field activities. 

Devon Energy used the method, called Image Frac, to map fluid distribution and proppant placement during well stimulations. The technology works by applying poroelastic diagnostics to the fluid pressure response of an adjacent well, as the stimulation treatment changes the stress levels in the reservoir rock. The technology was developed by innovation incubator Statoil Technology Invest (STI).

“We used this technology, along with several other fracture diagnostic tools, to evaluate a recent STACK spacing pilot,” said Kyle Haustveit, Devon completions engineer. (STACK is an acronym for the Sooner Trend, Anadarko [Basin], Canadian [County], and Kingfisher [County] plays.) 

A series of studies evaluated the impact of proppant and diverter designs, variable cluster spacing, and alternative fluid systems on well completions. Recommendations based on the use of the technology led to a new completion design that reduced the number of stages and lowered completion costs.

Improved Fluid Distribution

With the baseline proppant design, it was discovered that the introduction of proppant early in the treatment in a particular way often led to a degraded fluid conformance, with fluid blocked from entering smaller fractures and an accelerated growth rate occurring in larger fractures. 

The Image Frac mapping results showed that a change in the proppant introduction method was able to mitigate this effect (Fig. 1). Using the alternative method, the incidence of the negative impact of proppant introduction on fluid distribution along the stage was reduced from approximately 70% to 20%.

Fig. 1—A change in the method of introducing proppant reduced the incidence of negative impact on fluid distribution along the stage. Source: Statoil Technology Invest.

The studies also examined the relative performance of different diverters in their effects on fluid conformance along the well and the impact of diverter dropping techniques and volumes. 

The diverter in Fig. 2a strongly improved conformance about 15% of the time but had little benefit in more than 50% of the cases. The highly effective diverter shown in Fig. 2b, when it worked well, improved fluid distribution by achieving an average 35% reduction in the length of the longest fracture. 

Fig. 2—In a study of diverters and their dropping techniques, results were obtained on (a) the effectiveness of the diverter vs. its drop size, (b) the impact of diversion on fluid distribution along the stage as shown by the average length of the longest fracture, (c) the effectiveness of the diverter comparing single drops to multiple drops in a stage, and (d) the fluid distribution effectiveness for two designs: 1) the baseline with a diverter and 2)  a new diverter material. Source: Statoil Technology Invest.

The use of multiple drops as shown in Fig. 2C was found to improve fluid distribution in approximately 70% of the stages, compared with improvement in less than half of the stages when single diverter drops were made. 

Fig. 2D shows the potential for the new diverter material to improve conformance, with almost two out of every three diverter drops having proved effective. 
Further studies led to the discovery of a new fluid design that has shown promising results for improving fluid distribution. 

Fig. 3 shows the ratio of the second longest fracture to the longest fracture in a stage, which is an indication of fluid distribution effectiveness along the well. The baseline conformance case is poor, with the median length of the second longest fracture about half that of the longest. The use of a highly effective diverter significantly improved fluid distribution. However, the best distribution was achieved by using a new fluid design, which reduced the difference between the longest and next longest fractures even further.

Fig. 3—Based on the ratio of the second longest fracture in a stage to the longest, the distribution is poor in the baseline but improves significantly when the highly effective diverter is used. However, the new fluid design achieves the best distribution, as the difference between the longest and second longest fracture is further reduced. Source: Statoil Technology Invest.

The method requires pressure response from a limited number of fractures and is not suitable for a conventional reservoir or an unconventional one with extensive natural openings to flowing fluid, such as the Barnett Shale.

‘Seamless’ With Completions

“The technology is designed to be seamless with standard completion operations,” said Matthew Dawson, STI investment manager. Other than plugs that need to be set at certain times during fracturing, the method only requires the placement of a pressure gauge on the observation wellhead. In some cases, there are multiple observation wells and additional gauges are used. 

No sensors or downhole measurement tools are required, thus avoiding the risks of breakage, loss, or potential interference with operations, and no on-site personnel or permits are needed. Jobs can be quickly designed, compared with alternative methods for which planning and design can take weeks or months, Dawson said. 

New Diagnostics Aid Completion Designs

Joel Parshall, JPT Features Editor

30 November 2016

No editorial available



Don't miss out on the latest technology delivered to your email weekly.  Sign up for the JPT newsletter.  If you are not logged in, you will receive a confirmation email that you will need to click on to confirm you want to receive the newsletter.



No editorial available